I am an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Yale-NUS College, with a joint appointment by courtesy at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. Previously, I was a Stanton Nuclear Security Fellow at the MIT Security Studies Program, and a non-resident Visiting Fellow at the United Nations University in Tokyo.
My research focuses on how the desire for great-power status influences the behavior of rising powers in international security regimes. I am currently working on a book manuscript on this subject, based on my Ph.D. dissertation. I have also co-edited a policy-focused volume that brings together top scholars and analysts across generations from Japan and India to chart the future course of bilateral relations.
My writings on India's national security and foreign policy have appeared in various journals including Survival, Global Governance, International Affairs, and International Journal. In 2011, I co-founded the Youth Forum on Foreign Policy (YFFP), a non-profit organization dedicated to democratizing the foreign policy debate in India through the inclusion of younger voices.
I received my Ph.D. from the Department of Politics at Princeton University. I hold an MPA in International Development from Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, and a B.A. in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics from the University of Oxford. I have also worked at the Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi, and Innovations for Successful Societies, Princeton University.
Rising Powers and the Quest for Status in International Security Regimes
Since the end of the Cold War, a number of scholars have studied how the rise of new great powers such as China and India will impact global order. However, important questions such as why these countries might choose to become more “responsible” actors instead of simply free-riding on existing institutions, or conversely why they might undermine the very order that has facilitated their rise, have not been systematically studied. Existing literatures on power transition and international organization do not comprehensively explain these types of behaviors.
A rapidly growing literature on the pursuit of status in international politics can help shed light on these questions, but so far it has not demonstrated how or when status matters relative to other goals that states pursue in the international system, such as security and economic gain. In this book, I develop a theory of status-seeking to explain why rising powers sometimes uphold the rules and norms of international regimes when it is not in their material interest to do so; and conversely, having joined international regimes, why they sometimes break from them at great cost.
Drawing on social identity theory, I show that rising powers follow a range of strategies to attain great-power status, or symbolic equality with the great powers, and that these strategies translate into different rule-oriented behaviors—following, breaking, or shaping—in international regimes. A rising power’s choice of strategy will depend on the extent to which it perceives the international regime to be open to its rise and procedurally legitimate. I test this theory in the domain of international security regimes, specifically those designed to restrain certain weapons and modes of warfare.
Through longitudinal case studies of the United States and the maritime laws of war in the mid-19th century, Japan and naval arms control in the interwar period, and India and nuclear non-proliferation in the latter half of the 20th century, I show that rising powers draw important inferences about their own status from the design and functioning of international regimes, and are willing to accept significant risks to enhance their status within these regimes.
An electronic copy of the dissertation on which this book project is based is available upon request.
Click on highlighted text for links to PDF copies.
Poised for Partnership: Deepening India-Japan Relations in the Asian Century. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2016 (co-edited with Anthony Yazaki)
“The False Promise of India’s Soft Power,” Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 6:1, 2014
“From High Ground to High Table: The Evolution of Indian Multilateralism,” Global Governance, 17:3,
July 2011 (co-authored with David M. Malone)
“Indian Foreign Policy and Contemporary Security Challenges,” International Affairs, 87:1, 2011 (coauthored
with David M. Malone)
“India and China: Conflict and Cooperation,” Survival, 52:1, Feb/Mar 2010 (co-authored with David M.
“The Shock of the New: India-US Relations in Perspective,” International Journal, LXIV:4, Autumn 2009
(co-authored with David M. Malone)
CHAPTERS IN EDITED BOOKS
“Statuspolitik as Foreign Policy: Strategic Culture and India's Nuclear Behavior”. National Cultures and Foreign Policy Making in a Multipolar World. Submitted.
“Indian Multilateralism and the Global Human Rights Order,” in Doutje Lettinga and Lars van Troost
(eds.), India, Foreign Policy and Human Rights (Amsterdam: Amnesty International, 2015)
“India,” in Ajit Banerjee (ed.), Global Perspectives on Foreign Policies of Major Powers (New Delhi:
Academic Foundation, 2015)
“India’s International Development Program,” in Srinath Raghavan, David M. Malone and C. Raja
Mohan (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Indian Foreign Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015)
“Continuity and Change in India’s Foreign Policy,” in Benny Teh Cheng Guan (ed.), Security and
Foreign Policy in Asia (Singapore: World Scientific, 2014)
“Dilemmas of Sovereignty and Order: India and the UN Security Council,” in WPS Sidhu, Pratap
Bhanu Mehta and Bruce Jones (eds.), Shaping the Emerging World: India and the Multilateral Order
(Washington, D.C.: Brookings Press, 2013) – co-authored with David M. Malone
“Polity, Security, and Foreign Policy in Contemporary India,” in T.V. Paul (ed.), South Asia’s Weak
States: Understanding the Regional Insecurity Predicament (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010) – coauthored with David M. Malone
ARTICLES IN SPECIALIZED JOURNALS
“What can economic interdependence do for Asia (Commentary),” Asian Journal of Public Affairs, 7:1,
“Can't Buy Me Love: India's Foreign Aid and Soft Power,” Seminar, 658, June 2014
“India and the UN Security Council: An Ambiguous Tale,” Economic and Political Weekly, 48:29, 2013
(co-authored with David M. Malone)
“The International Politics of Status,” India in Transition, Center for the Advanced Study of India,
University of Pennsylvania, November 2014
“The Perceptions of Others: World Opinion and Indian Foreign Policy,” India in Transition, Center for
the Advanced Study of India, University of Pennsylvania, August 2013
“Embattled Sovereignty: India, the UN and Humanitarian Intervention,” India in Transition, Center for
the Advanced Study of India, University of Pennsylvania, February 2013
“India and the Asian Security Architecture,” German Marshall Fund, December 2014 (co-authored with
“Challenges of a Multipolar World: The United States, India, and the European Union in the AsiaPacific,”
German Marshall Fund, July 2013 (co-authored with Clara O’Donnell)
“Meet India’s new nationalists,” The Indian Express, October 18, 2015
“Bringing Tokyo closer to New Delhi,” The Hindu, December 26, 2014 (co-authored with Anthony
“The less said, the worse,” The Indian Express, July 29, 2014
“Inaccessible India,” The Hindu, August 12, 2013
“India must get in on the ground floor,” The Hindu, January 18, 2013 (co-authored with Shailey
Why do countries go to war with each other and why do they cooperate? How do domestic institutions or individual leaders impact a country’s external behaviour? Do international laws and institutions have any influence in global affairs? These types of questions have been central to the study of international relations in the 20th century. This introductory course examines the major theories of international conflict and cooperation that have emerged from this body of scholarship. It also covers thematic issues such as economic interdependence, global governance, nuclear weapons, transnational movements, and the rise of new powers. The course provides an introduction to IR theory and instances in which insights from IR can illuminate the dynamics of real-world phenomena.
INDIA AS A RISING POWER
Yale-NUS College, Spring 2016-17 [syllabus]
With the world’s second largest population, third largest economy, and third largest military, India is a pivotal country in Asia and the world. This course covers modern India’s history, domestic politics, and foreign policy and provide students with a sophisticated understanding of the world’s largest democracy and its changing place in global affairs. Weekly modules begin by developing relevant context from the literature on international relations, and then delve into detailed works on India.
MODERN SOCIAL THOUGHT
Yale-NUS College, Fall 2016-17
This co-taught course introduces second-year undergraduate students to foundational figures of modern social thought and explores the ways in which their writings have been taken up in contemporary social analysis and political practice in different parts of the world. Taking Ibn Khaldun’s pre-modern analysis of society as a point of departure, students immerse themselves in the complex ideas and systematic visions of major social thinkers such as Alexis de Tocqueville, Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Michel Foucault. The course also grapples with several other characteristically modern developments including (a) the revolution in thought and practice ushered in by feminist activists and thinkers such as Olympe de Gouges, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Simone de Beauvoir; and (b) the provincializing of European understandings of society and modernity as articulated in the writings of Frantz Fanon, Ho Chi Min, Mohandas Gandhi and Lee Kwan Yew, and in the scholarship of Chandra Mohanty, Kwame Appiah, Arjun Appadurai, Dipesh Chakrabarty, and Ranajit Guha, among others.
Princeton University, Assistant Instructor, Spring 2014
Grand strategy is the broad and encompassing policies and undertakings that political leaders pursue-financial, economic, military, diplomatic-to achieve their objectives in peacetime and in war. This course examines the theory and practice of grand strategy both to illuminate how relations among city-states, empires, kingdoms and nation states have evolved over the centuries and also to identify some common challenges that have confronted all who seek to make and execute grand strategy from Pericles to Barack Obama.
Princeton University, Assistant Instructor, Spring 2013
A study of the politics and history of human rights. What are human rights? How can dictatorships be resisted from the inside and the outside? Can we prevent genocide? Is it morally acceptable and politically wise to launch humanitarian military interventions to prevent the slaughter of foreign civilians? What are the laws of war, and how can we punish the war criminals who violate them? Cases include the Ottoman Empire, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, Bosnia, and Rwanda.
Mailing address: 28 College Avenue West, #01-501, Singapore 138533.
Please fill out the form below to send me a message.
"Uncle Sam: "Them fellers over there want to disarm but none of 'em dast do it first!"" By John Scott Clubb, 1906. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C.
Uncredited image of Japan and the great power club, available here.
"This Insult, How Can We Bear?" Cartoon in Shankar's Weekly, June 2, 1974.
"A Lesson for Anti-Expansionists. Showing how Uncle Sam has been an expansionist first, last, and all the time." By Victor Gillam in Judge, Arkell Publishing Company, New York, 1899.
"Columbia's Easter bonnet / Ehrhart after sketch by Dalrymple." Cover of Puck magazine, 6 April 1901.